Yes, journalists are under siege of powerful forces, but......
Journalists
in Nairobi Mombasa have within the last one month held demonstrations over what
they claim to be the diminishing space of their operational environment. They
have argued that they are undergoing threats, intimidation, and harassment,
trolling and a tapping of their phones by people whom they claimed to be allied
to Government.
The
journalists particularly in Mombasa documented cases in which their colleagues
either died under mysterious circumstances or suffered in one way or another at
the hand of powerful. They created hush tag #Journalistsundersiege to
make a case for their grievances.
Looking
at it deeply, you realize that the journalists are more than justified to
express their rage. They are justified to vent their frustrations, express
their fears and even draw the eye of power towards the increasing number of
cases of threats, harassment and intimidation some of which have been at the
hands of security agents. They are justified to express their frustrations over
the inability to tell the story as it is without any frontiers on behalf of the
majority.
That
said, the media has moral and legal responsibility to tell the story regardless
of affiliations for the good of the society.
In
conversations held with colleagues, it emerged that while it is true that
journalists are under siege of powerful forces, they are under siege of compromise.
The siege that took the journalists to the streets is more physical; its harm
can be seen and accounted for. Under compromise, the damage is not explicit but
is interwoven into the system thus affecting effective
functional roles of the media.
Take
for instance the widely known but rarely talked about brown envelope
journalism. The giver of the envelope puts the journalist under siege and
therefore they cannot be free to report the way things have happened. Brown
envelope silences the journalist; it creates a gate in which the journalist
sees the story from the eyes of the news-maker thus denying audiences and
readers a chance to get the whole picture.
There
are widely circulated but unverified claims that some journalists in Mombasa have
had their education fully or partially funded by politicians. The import of
this is that the journalists cease to be members of the fourth estate and
instead become sycophantic praise of their funders. They are basically under
siege, and not for a specific period of time but for a lifetime.
Add
this to the emergence of powerful public relations whose intentions are still
in line with the founders of the profession – to contain the effects of
muckrakers. Public relations and reputation management has always had money and
therefore willing to go any length to spend and ensure that the reputation and
profiles of the subjects remains in top form.
On the other hand, a good number of journalists are famished. Some earn
peanuts and while others have not been paid for quite a while. So whenever they
meet with deep pockets, they are always ready to sing to their bid.
There
are claims that the same journalists put their colleagues under the siege of
compromises. A compromised individual would do anything to ensure that they
guard their compromise and therefore they will sell out their colleagues thus jeopardizing their lives. Further, compromised journalists tinker with politicians and the
end result is that they also end up taking political positions and acting as gatekeepers
of the political class both in the newsroom and in the field. They will watch
out who is filing which negative story against those who fund them. They will take
recordings of functions to their funders and at the end of the day, the trade
becomes muddled in siege.
It
is probably a time that journalists need to start having a conversation with
their employers, The Media Council of Kenya and the representative associations
on how they can conduct their work independently and without frontiers. My only
concern is that a free and independent media never existed anywhere as the
pressures are more than those that took journalists to the streets.
Ends…….
Comments
Post a Comment